SAT-310 - An Appraisal of TSH as A Screening Tool for Thyroid Dysfunction

TSH is commonly used to screen for thyroid dysfunction, primarily because of its log-linear relationship with free T4 (FT4). However, this conviction leads to a practice in which thyroid treatment is frequently initiated solely based on TSH without further testing. Furthermore, there is significant ambiguity regarding the relationship of TSH with free T3 (FT3), total T4 (TT4), and total T3 (TT3). To elucidate these issues, we compared the relationship of TSH with all 4 thyroid indices in a representative, non-institutionalized US population.

We utilized the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2012, in which TSH and 4 thyroid indices (FT3, TT3, FT4, TT4) were measured. Individuals with known thyroid disease or taking thyroid medication were excluded. Only subjects aged 20 years or older were included. Sample-weighted analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 30. The relationship between the log-transformed TSH and the four thyroid indices was assessed using a linear regression model. Sensitivity and specificity were computed with 95% confidence intervals.

This study included 7,887 adults (mean age 46 and 48.18% female). We found strong log-linear correlations (P < 0.0001) between the log-transformed TSH and all four thyroid indices, with standardized beta coefficients of -0.2157 for FT4, -0.1542 for FT3, -0.1289 for TT4, and -0.0748 for TT3. TSH within the reference range showed high sensitivity but low specificity for normal thyroid indices: FT4 (97.74%, 13.59%), FT3 (95.05%, 7.02%), TT4 (88.91%, 25.51%), and TT3 (90.43%, 17.53%). In contrast, a low TSH was found to have a low sensitivity but high specificity for high thyroid indices: FT4 (12.04% sensitivity, 99.99% specificity), FT3 (12.04%, 96.58%), TT4 (13.02%, 99.13%), and TT3 (8.46%, 98.59%). A high TSH was also found to have a low sensitivity but high specificity for low thyroid indices: FT4 (11.41%, 97.71%), FT3 (1.01%, 98.53%), TT4 (26.35%, 89.79%), and TT3 (13.67%, 91.77%). In summary, TSH levels within the reference range are highly sensitive for normal thyroid function, while TSH levels outside the reference range are not particularly sensitive for detecting thyroid dysfunction. Thus, a TSH within the reference range is effective at ruling out abnormal thyroid function, but an abnormal TSH is insufficient to confirm thyroid dysfunction, highlighting the need for comprehensive thyroid testing.

This study demonstrates that a normal TSH level is highly sensitive in identifying individuals with normal thyroid hormone levels, making it an excellent screening test for euthyroid status. However, an abnormal TSH level does not reliably predict abnormal thyroid hormone levels. Thus, treatment should not be initiated solely based on an abnormal TSH result. Additional laboratory testing with FT4 (occasionally FT3, TT4, and TT3) is necessary to confirm the nature of any thyroid dysfunction.

*Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO must not be released to the press or the public until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.*